<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Perpetualized &#187; Pet Peeves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.perpetualized.com/tag/pet-peeves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.perpetualized.com</link>
	<description>This is my life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Islands and links</title>
		<link>http://www.perpetualized.com/51/islands-and-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.perpetualized.com/51/islands-and-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Perpetualized</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Views and Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pet Peeves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.perpetualized.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've noticed how stingy some sites are about linking out, and I admit I've caught myself being that way too sometimes.  Does this really make sense?<p><a href="http://www.perpetualized.com/51/islands-and-links/">Islands and links</a> - Read more posts like this at <a href="http://www.perpetualized.com">Perpetualized</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always on the lookout for new and interesting ideas I can work with. Today I ran across this post on <a title="Drudge Report: News Site That Sends Readers Away With Links Has Highest Engagement" href="http://publishing2.com/2008/09/15/drudge-report-news-site-that-sends-readers-away-with-links-has-highest-engagement/" target="_blank">reader engagement and linking out</a>. The article, interestingly enough, touched on something I&#8217;ve been thinking about lately&#8211;or maybe that&#8217;s simply why the article caught my attention.</p>
<p>I have several older websites that still get email. Those emails are usually nice comments about the usefulness of the site and I always smile a little when I get one. I wonder too, why some of my newer sites don&#8217;t see those kinds of comments.</p>
<p>The differences between these sites is simply this: The older site has tons of links that link out to other useful sites I&#8217;ve found over the years. The newer sites have fewer links out, and are more heavily populated with my own &#8220;original&#8221; content. Now, I realize original content is important, but sometimes I know there&#8217;s someone out there that&#8217;s better able to say what it is I want said. These are the times when link outs make the most sense and when I should be linking out.</p>
<p>Come to think of it, many of the sites I visit aren&#8217;t spectacular in and of themselves, but they are able to pull together stuff on the web and make it useful in a way that it wasn&#8217;t before.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I like social bookmark sites. Articles and blogs are all pulled together by tags. It makes browsing easier and more useful.</p>
<p>Aggregators are important tools when it comes to the web, because there&#8217;s just so much data available and that makes for some serious information overload. I use up a lot of time online.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking of doing more aggregation sites like those older sites I still have. I love them and I&#8217;ve always thought they served a great purpose. These days you see fewer and fewer niche aggregators&#8211;or maybe I&#8217;m just not looking in the right places!&#8211;but there&#8217;s a bigger need than ever for them. Even the small social bookmark sites get overrun with so much content that narrowing it down to a very specific topic is difficult.</p>
<p>In essence I&#8217;ve created my own aggregated links within Google Reader. But I&#8217;ve still ended up with so much stuff to sift through that I feel a little like I&#8217;m going to go crazy sometimes with the speed reading that I have to practice to get through all the headlines.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also noticed how stingy some sites are about linking out, and I admit I&#8217;ve caught myself being that way too sometimes.  Is this really the way I want to be?</p>
<p>I can make this stuff easier for others to digest by pulling it together on some of my sites. Frankly, I&#8217;m tired of trying to be an island of content. I&#8217;ve said before I have too many domain names and I might have just found a better use for some of them.</p>
<p>If my site is good enough, any visitors I send away will eventually make their way back.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.perpetualized.com/51/islands-and-links/">Islands and links</a> - Read more posts like this at <a href="http://www.perpetualized.com">Perpetualized</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.perpetualized.com/51/islands-and-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
